PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SBM Offshore NV (SBMO.AS) and NN Group N.V. (NN.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBMO.AS achieves a 39.11% return, which is significantly higher than NN.AS's 12.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SBMO.AS having a 16.62% annualized return and NN.AS not far behind at 16.38%.


SBMO.AS

1D
0.66%
1M
-5.78%
YTD
39.11%
6M
36.44%
1Y
60.92%
3Y*
41.89%
5Y*
25.30%
10Y*
16.62%

NN.AS

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
12.00%
6M
17.80%
1Y
31.97%
3Y*
38.80%
5Y*
19.01%
10Y*
16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBMO.AS
SBM Offshore NV
39.11%52.28%43.62%-8.52%19.15%-11.57%-0.38%30.88%-10.55%-0.25%
NN.AS
NN Group N.V.
12.00%66.29%27.04%1.91%-15.17%41.58%12.46%3.13%0.87%17.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SBMO.AS and NN.AS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between SBMO.AS and NN.AS has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBMO.AS
SBMO.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SBMO.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBMO.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBMO.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SBMO.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBMO.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NN.AS
NN.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NN.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NN.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NN.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NN.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NN.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SBM Offshore NV (SBMO.AS) and NN Group N.V. (NN.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBMO.ASNN.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

4.14

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.89

11.52

+2.37

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBMO.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the NN.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBMO.AS and NN.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBMO.ASNN.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.98

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.79

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.64

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.68

-0.31

Drawdowns

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBMO.AS drawdown since its inception was -71.04%, which is greater than NN.AS's maximum drawdown of -46.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBMO.AS and NN.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBMO.ASNN.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.04%

-46.30%

-24.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-7.91%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.68%

-21.10%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.96%

-35.80%

+13.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-46.30%

+3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

-4.76%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.73%

-8.67%

-19.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

2.78%

+1.62%

Volatility

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS - Volatility Comparison

SBM Offshore NV (SBMO.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to NN Group N.V. (NN.AS) at 4.90%. This indicates that SBMO.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NN.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBMO.ASNN.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

4.90%

+4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.15%

13.02%

+6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.96%

16.52%

+8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

23.78%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.35%

25.21%

+5.14%

Dividends

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS - Dividend Comparison

SBMO.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than NN.AS's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NN.AS
NN Group N.V.
5.45%5.38%7.99%8.14%6.71%5.04%6.36%5.91%4.89%4.35%5.13%3.16%
SBMO.AS
SBM Offshore NV
1.49%3.47%4.51%8.00%6.23%5.68%4.79%1.99%1.56%1.46%1.24%0.00%

Financials

SBMO.AS vs. NN.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SBM Offshore NV and NN Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SBMO.AS and NN.AS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBMO.AS and NN.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer