PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBMIX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBMIX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SBMIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBMIX achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 8.80% return.


SBMIX

1D
0.47%
1M
2.98%
YTD
5.28%
6M
5.18%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*

FSRKX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.07%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBMIX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SBMIX
Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio
5.28%12.25%11.36%11.96%-10.38%13.50%9.84%5.88%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
8.80%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SBMIX and FSRKX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between SBMIX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBMIX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBMIX
SBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBMIX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SBMIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBMIXFSRKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.73

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

8.79

-6.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

32.89

-23.23

SBMIX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBMIX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBMIXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

3.61

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.95

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.93

-0.32

Drawdowns

SBMIX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBMIX drawdown since its inception was -23.97%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBMIX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBMIXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.97%

-19.93%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-1.93%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.14%

-5.84%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.92%

-12.74%

-2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-3.21%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

0.51%

+1.06%

Volatility

SBMIX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SBMIX) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.33%. This indicates that SBMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBMIXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

1.33%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

3.67%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

4.71%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

6.94%

+3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.90%

7.79%

+4.11%

SBMIX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBMIX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

SBMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than FSRKX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
4.25%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%
SBMIX
Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.62%10.12%3.70%1.32%5.93%8.04%1.35%3.40%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBMIX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBMIX has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to FSRKX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBMIX dropped -23.97% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBMIX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer