PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBMBX vs. GOFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBMBX vs. GOFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX) and GMO Resources Fund (GOFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, SBMBX has underperformed GOFIX with an annualized return of 2.08%, while GOFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.


SBMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
1.48%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
2.08%

GOFIX

1D
-0.82%
1M
-6.83%
YTD
22.71%
6M
23.28%
1Y
53.57%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBMBX vs. GOFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBMBX
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund
0.00%5.05%-7.25%6.28%19.60%25.58%-19.21%-0.96%-18.00%8.44%
GOFIX
GMO Resources Fund
22.71%23.10%-17.91%-1.38%-0.80%32.01%22.47%20.10%-6.73%28.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SBMBX and GOFIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between SBMBX and GOFIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBMBX vs. GOFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBMBX
SBMBX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SBMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SBMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GOFIX
GOFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GOFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GOFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBMBX vs. GOFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX) and GMO Resources Fund (GOFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBMBXGOFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

5.38

-4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.89

22.71

-21.82

SBMBX vs. GOFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBMBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the GOFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBMBX and GOFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBMBX vs. GOFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBMBX drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than GOFIX's maximum drawdown of -51.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBMBX and GOFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBMBXGOFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.35%

-51.77%

-22.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-9.78%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.34%

-41.28%

+15.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.66%

-45.10%

+18.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.48%

-45.98%

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.22%

-9.78%

-21.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.69%

-13.56%

-15.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.32%

+0.48%

Volatility

SBMBX vs. GOFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX) is 0.00%, while GMO Resources Fund (GOFIX) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that SBMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBMBXGOFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

6.63%

-6.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

15.13%

-11.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

20.49%

-10.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.60%

25.30%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.03%

25.30%

-1.27%

SBMBX vs. GOFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBMBX has a 3.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GOFIX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBMBX vs. GOFIX - Dividend Comparison

SBMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than GOFIX's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOFIX
GMO Resources Fund
3.57%4.38%3.01%5.90%10.25%17.81%3.66%2.99%4.06%3.86%2.89%3.30%
SBMBX
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund
2.13%2.13%2.17%0.00%2.75%0.75%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBMBX and GOFIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOFIX has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to SBMBX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBMBX dropped -74.35% vs GOFIX's -51.77%.

GOFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBMBX and GOFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer