SBIT vs. CBXO
SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%), while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. SBIT is passively managed, while CBXO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. SBIT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
SBIT vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 37.02% return, which is significantly higher than CBXO's -3.67% return.
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | 73.03% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.67% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIT and CBXO is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBIT vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
SBIT
CBXO
SBIT vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBIT | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBIT | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | -2.36 | +1.89 |
Drawdowns
SBIT vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIT | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.35% | -11.40% | -79.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.26% | -11.40% | -66.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.55% | -8.46% | -60.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.69% | — | — |
Volatility
SBIT vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBIT | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.18% | 7.23% | +79.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.47% | 7.23% | +90.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.47% | 7.23% | +90.24% |
SBIT vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBIT vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than CBXO's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBIT and CBXO have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.
SBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SBIT and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for SBIT and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer