SBIT vs. BFOC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%), while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. SBIT is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. SBIT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.

Performance

SBIT vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 37.02% return, which is significantly higher than BFOC's -7.39% return.

SBIT

• 1D: 5.42%
• 1M: 46.58%
• YTD: 37.02%
• 6M: 52.37%
• 1Y: 68.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFOC

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -2.82%
• YTD: -7.39%
• 6M: -9.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIT vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	37.02%	60.47%
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-7.39%	-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIT and BFOC is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	-0.90

Return for Risk

SBIT vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 26
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIT vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBIT	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBIT	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.46	-1.88	+1.42

Drawdowns

SBIT vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and BFOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBIT	BFOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.35%	-18.20%	-73.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.26%	-18.20%	-60.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.55%	-12.52%	-56.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBIT	BFOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	68.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.18%	12.61%	+74.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	97.47%	12.61%	+84.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.47%	12.61%	+84.86%

SBIT vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBIT vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.42%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBIT and BFOC in my portfolio?

SBIT and BFOC have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBIT or BFOC?

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBIT or BFOC?

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBIT or BFOC?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

What is the main difference between SBIT and BFOC?

SBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SBIT and 0.90% for BFOC.