SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE
SBIM.DE (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SBIM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Broad CTB Select while XMME.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SBIM.DE returned 7.90%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SBIM.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIM.DE achieves a 26.80% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
SBIM.DE
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 26.80%
- 6M
- 27.28%
- 1Y
- 47.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- —
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBIM.DE Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF | 26.80% | 19.60% | 13.97% | 4.26% | -15.54% | 5.21% | 16.37% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 15.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIM.DE and XMME.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SBIM.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SBIM.DE
XMME.DE
SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBIM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.55 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 4.98 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.92 | 18.04 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBIM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 3.00 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.45 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIM.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.22%, smaller than the maximum XMME.DE drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIM.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.22% | -31.96% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -10.67% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -19.16% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -24.38% | -0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -1.04% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -9.53% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.95% | +0.10% |
Volatility
SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) have volatilities of 7.34% and 7.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBIM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 7.48% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.35% | 14.90% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 17.70% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 16.74% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 18.61% | -1.98% |
SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIM.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SBIM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBIM.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SBIM.DE and XMME.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SBIM.DE.
SBIM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Broad CTB Select, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SBIM.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for SBIM.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer