SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE).
SBIM.DE and 6AQQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SBIM.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Broad CTB Select. It was launched on Sep 14, 2020. 6AQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both SBIM.DE and 6AQQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBIM.DE Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF | 4.08% | 19.60% | 13.97% | 4.26% | -15.54% | 5.21% | 16.37% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | -4.11% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 51.54% | -29.96% | 39.62% | 8.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIM.DE achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly higher than 6AQQ.DE's -4.11% return.
SBIM.DE
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- —
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -4.11%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 18.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIM.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SBIM.DE
6AQQ.DE
SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBIM.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.78 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.19 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.35 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | 7.01 | +2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBIM.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.78 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.68 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.00 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIM.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBIM.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIM.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.22%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIM.DE and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIM.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.22% | -31.19% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -10.01% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -31.19% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.55% | -7.48% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -5.40% | -5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.35% | -0.40% |
Volatility
SBIM.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 4.69%. This indicates that SBIM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBIM.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 4.69% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 11.79% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.74% | 20.59% | -1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 19.84% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 19.65% | -3.37% |