SBEMX vs. FHKFX
SBEMX (Segall Bryant & Hamill Emerging Markets Fund) and FHKFX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SBEMX returned 12.17%/yr vs 7.54%/yr for FHKFX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SBEMX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHKFX.
Performance
SBEMX vs. FHKFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBEMX achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly lower than FHKFX's 20.27% return.
SBEMX
- 1D
- 4.47%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- 7.07%
- YTD
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 35.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.79%
FHKFX
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- YTD
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 41.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SBEMX vs. FHKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBEMX Segall Bryant & Hamill Emerging Markets Fund | 16.68% | 35.14% | 13.83% | 20.64% | -16.04% | 5.46% | 7.17% | 18.83% | -10.99% |
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund | 20.27% | 38.51% | 5.42% | 12.10% | -24.50% | -4.15% | 17.85% | 9.64% | -8.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBEMX and FHKFX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SBEMX and FHKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBEMX vs. FHKFX — Risk / Return Rank
SBEMX
FHKFX
SBEMX vs. FHKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Emerging Markets Fund (SBEMX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBEMX | FHKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.67 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 8.71 | -1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBEMX vs. FHKFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBEMX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, smaller than the maximum FHKFX drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBEMX and FHKFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBEMX | FHKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.05% | -45.47% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.29% | -14.49% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -16.71% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.51% | -39.01% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -11.03% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.39% | -17.01% | +4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 4.43% | +0.15% |
Volatility
SBEMX vs. FHKFX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Emerging Markets Fund (SBEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) at 9.54%. This indicates that SBEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBEMX | FHKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.67% | 9.54% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.52% | 21.41% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.06% | 23.69% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 19.95% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 20.18% | -3.08% |
SBEMX vs. FHKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBEMX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBEMX vs. FHKFX - Dividend Comparison
SBEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than FHKFX's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund | 1.98% | 2.38% | 2.86% | 2.43% | 2.56% | 3.46% | 1.38% | 2.28% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBEMX Segall Bryant & Hamill Emerging Markets Fund | 2.36% | 2.76% | 6.69% | 5.59% | 4.19% | 5.38% | 1.77% | 2.61% | 3.32% | 4.89% | 2.09% | 4.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SBEMX and FHKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SBEMX has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to FHKFX (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBEMX dropped -41.05% vs FHKFX's -45.47%.
FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBEMX and FHKFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer