SBB vs. SSO
SBB (ProShares Short SmallCap600) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SBB is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%), while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SBB returned -11.90%/yr vs 23.69%/yr for SSO. Their -0.77 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SBB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
SBB vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBB achieves a -18.99% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 23.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SBB has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of -11.90%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.69% annualized return.
SBB
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -13.87%
- YTD
- -18.99%
- 1Y
- -25.10%
- 3Y*
- -10.24%
- 5Y*
- -6.51%
- 10Y*
- -11.90%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.49%
SSO
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 21.77%
- YTD
- 23.77%
- 1Y
- 42.09%
- 3Y*
- 35.52%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 23.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.82K | $20.79K | $47.74K | |
| $209.12M | $200.07M | $224.05M |
SBB vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600 | -18.99% | -3.56% | -3.73% | -10.44% | 13.75% | -25.40% | -26.53% | -18.64% | 8.40% | -12.70% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 23.77% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBB and SSO is -0.70, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2007 | -0.77 |
The correlation between SBB and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBB vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
SBB
SSO
SBB vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.29 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 2.33 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.85 | 9.31 | -11.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBB vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBB drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBB and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -84.67% | -11.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.84% | -18.17% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.36% | -35.21% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -46.73% | +7.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.51% | -59.34% | -14.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.03% | 0.00% | -96.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.70% | -19.44% | -55.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.87% | 4.53% | +9.34% |
Volatility
SBB vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) is 4.17%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 8.20%. This indicates that SBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 8.20% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 20.57% | -8.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 25.75% | -8.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 33.95% | -12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.25% | 35.94% | -12.69% |
SBB vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBB vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
SBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than SSO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600 | 3.84% | 3.44% | 4.86% | 4.64% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.20% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBB and SSO have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSO has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to SBB (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBB dropped -96.03% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.69% vs -11.90% for SBB. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SBB has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.69% return vs -11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBB.
SBB has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.63% for SSO.
SBB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. SBB tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SBB and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBB and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer