PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBASX vs. NESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SBASX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SBASX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
-0.48%3.95%11.89%13.96%-13.13%23.52%22.80%
NESGX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund
9.51%10.50%12.76%5.68%-30.21%10.59%71.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBASX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 9.51% return.


SBASX

1D
-1.04%
1M
-9.50%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
1.76%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*

NESGX

1D
-4.45%
1M
-7.07%
YTD
9.51%
6M
12.14%
1Y
47.82%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SBASX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SBASX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBASX
SBASX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SBASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SBASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NESGX
NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBASX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBASXNESGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.32

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

1.88

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.25

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.38

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.03

8.02

-4.99

SBASX vs. NESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBASX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the NESGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBASX and NESGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBASXNESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.32

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.02

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.51

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between SBASX and NESGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SBASX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison

SBASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, while NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
5.61%5.58%5.48%3.65%2.10%18.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NESGX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.16%25.09%13.69%8.43%22.26%8.94%6.67%2.52%

Drawdowns

SBASX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBASX drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum NESGX drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBASX and NESGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SBASXNESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-50.29%

+15.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-17.27%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

-50.05%

+23.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.44%

-9.15%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-11.74%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

5.13%

-1.53%

Volatility

SBASX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) is 6.66%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that SBASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SBASXNESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

10.96%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

22.87%

-10.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.66%

35.07%

-13.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

29.08%

-9.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

25.51%

-3.22%