PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBAR vs. PFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBAR vs. PFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBAR achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than PFF's 1.44% return.


SBAR

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.18%
YTD
3.13%
6M
2.89%
1Y
10.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFF

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.15%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
3.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBAR vs. PFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SBAR and PFF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025

0.53

The correlation between SBAR and PFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBAR vs. PFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBAR
SBAR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SBAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SBAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBAR vs. PFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBARPFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.17

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.35

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

4.07

+3.57

SBAR vs. PFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the PFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBAR and PFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBAR vs. PFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBAR drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum PFF drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBAR and PFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBARPFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-65.55%

+60.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.32%

-5.28%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-2.54%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-5.75%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.75%

-0.31%

Volatility

SBAR vs. PFF - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) at 2.42%. This indicates that SBAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBARPFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.42%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

5.42%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

7.03%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.84%

10.35%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.84%

12.68%

-2.84%

SBAR vs. PFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBAR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PFF's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBAR vs. PFF - Dividend Comparison

SBAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.63%, more than PFF's 5.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
5.55%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%
SBAR
Simplify Barrier Income ETF
12.63%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBAR and PFF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBAR has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to PFF (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBAR dropped -5.32% vs PFF's -65.55%.

On 1-year performance, SBAR leads with 10.95% vs 7.10% for PFF. On fees, PFF is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PFF has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBAR has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFF is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SBAR.

SBAR has the higher dividend yield at 12.63%, compared with 5.55% for PFF.

SBAR is categorized as Derivative Income, while PFF is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBAR and 0.46% for PFF.

SBAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBAR and PFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer