PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBAR vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBAR vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBAR achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.67% return.


SBAR

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.82%
YTD
2.69%
6M
4.14%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.44%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.79%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBAR vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SBAR
Simplify Barrier Income ETF
2.69%13.80%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.67%31.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SBAR and PEPS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.66

The correlation between SBAR and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBAR vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBAR
SBAR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SBAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SBAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBAR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBAR vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBARPEPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.26

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

15.28

-6.85

SBAR vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBAR and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBARPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.45

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.05

+0.47

Drawdowns

SBAR vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBAR drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBAR and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBARPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-21.26%

+15.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.32%

-9.80%

+4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.51%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-2.77%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

2.09%

-0.66%

Volatility

SBAR vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) is 2.29%, while Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that SBAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBARPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

2.77%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.66%

9.83%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.97%

13.06%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.80%

18.31%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.80%

18.31%

-8.51%

SBAR vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBAR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBAR vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

SBAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.68%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%
SBAR
Simplify Barrier Income ETF
12.68%8.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBAR and PEPS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEPS has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to SBAR (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBAR dropped -5.32% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 31.83% vs 12.00% for SBAR. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SBAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 31.83% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SBAR.

SBAR has the higher dividend yield at 12.68%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBAR and 0.10% for PEPS.

PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBAR and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer