PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBAR vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBAR vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBAR achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 9.91% return.


SBAR

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.82%
YTD
2.69%
6M
4.14%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.27%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBAR vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SBAR and GPIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.67

The correlation between SBAR and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

SBAR vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SBAR
GPIX

Financial Services

82.0%
11.6%

Technology

33.1%
35.5%

Communication Services

10.7%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.4%

Industrials

8.7%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Financial Services

SBAR
82.0%
GPIX
11.6%

Technology

SBAR
33.1%
GPIX
35.5%

Communication Services

SBAR
10.7%
GPIX
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SBAR
10.1%
GPIX
10.1%

Healthcare

SBAR
9.8%
GPIX
8.4%

Industrials

SBAR
8.7%
GPIX
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

SBAR
5.4%
GPIX
4.9%

Energy

SBAR
3.5%
GPIX
3.5%

Utilities

SBAR
2.5%
GPIX
2.4%

Real Estate

SBAR
2.0%
GPIX
2.0%

Basic Materials

SBAR
1.9%
GPIX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBAR vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBAR
SBAR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SBAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SBAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBAR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBAR vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBARGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.33

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

16.77

-8.34

SBAR vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBAR and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBARGPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.52

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.78

-0.27

Drawdowns

SBAR vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBAR drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum GPIX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBAR and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBARGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-17.50%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.32%

-7.71%

+2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.48%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-1.48%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.53%

-0.10%

Volatility

SBAR vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Barrier Income ETF (SBAR) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) have volatilities of 2.29% and 2.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBARGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

2.26%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.66%

7.89%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.97%

10.17%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.80%

13.80%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.80%

13.80%

-4.00%

SBAR vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBAR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBAR vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

SBAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.68%, more than GPIX's 8.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.00%8.01%7.45%1.40%
SBAR
Simplify Barrier Income ETF
12.68%8.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBAR and GPIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBAR has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBAR dropped -5.32% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.55% vs 12.00% for SBAR. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.55% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SBAR.

SBAR has the higher dividend yield at 12.68%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBAR and 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBAR and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer