SAXIX vs. GGBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about SA Global Fixed Income Fund (SAXIX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX).
SAXIX is managed by SA Funds. It was launched on Jul 28, 1999. GGBFX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006.
Performance
SAXIX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SAXIX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAXIX SA Global Fixed Income Fund | 0.35% | 4.87% | 5.33% | 4.55% | -6.79% | -1.59% | 0.89% | 3.40% | 1.17% | 1.17% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | -1.33% | 7.55% | 0.40% | 5.77% | -13.90% | -2.57% | 5.03% | 11.04% | -4.74% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAXIX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than GGBFX's -1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SAXIX has underperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 1.21%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.91% annualized return.
SAXIX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.21%
GGBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAXIX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAXIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SAXIX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank
SAXIX
GGBFX
SAXIX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA Global Fixed Income Fund (SAXIX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAXIX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 0.98 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 1.41 | +1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.18 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.06 | +1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.18 | 4.31 | +5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAXIX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 0.98 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | -0.10 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.43 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.69 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between SAXIX and GGBFX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SAXIX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison
SAXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAXIX SA Global Fixed Income Fund | 4.83% | 4.85% | 6.01% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 0.00% | 2.16% | 2.83% | 2.11% | 0.85% | 1.25% | 0.80% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | 3.05% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 1.44% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.96% | 4.01% |
Drawdowns
SAXIX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAXIX drawdown since its inception was -9.94%, smaller than the maximum GGBFX drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAXIX and GGBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAXIX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -27.03% | +17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.59% | -3.80% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.94% | -20.84% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.94% | -20.97% | +11.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -5.48% | +4.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -4.64% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.94% | -0.50% |
Volatility
SAXIX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SA Global Fixed Income Fund (SAXIX) is 0.84%, while GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that SAXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAXIX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 1.76% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.32% | 2.63% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 4.00% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.70% | 4.91% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 4.49% | -2.42% |