PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAWMX vs. PDAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAWMX vs. PDAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX) and PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWMX achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than PDAVX's 6.40% return.


SAWMX

1D
0.14%
1M
1.38%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.33%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
9.02%

PDAVX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.59%
YTD
6.40%
6M
5.28%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
10.38%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAWMX vs. PDAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAWMX
SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund
10.67%18.15%6.40%13.60%-8.96%16.67%4.12%17.03%-7.87%13.89%
PDAVX
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
6.40%14.21%5.48%7.60%-16.77%6.51%12.87%14.84%-9.55%15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SAWMX and PDAVX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.81

The correlation between SAWMX and PDAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAWMX vs. PDAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAWMX
SAWMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SAWMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PDAVX
PDAVX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PDAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAWMX vs. PDAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX) and PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAWMXPDAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.24

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

1.80

+2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.63

6.92

+10.71

SAWMX vs. PDAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAWMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the PDAVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAWMX and PDAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAWMX vs. PDAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWMX drawdown since its inception was -30.56%, which is greater than PDAVX's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWMX and PDAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAWMXPDAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.56%

-25.58%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.79%

-8.89%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-12.17%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.57%

-24.53%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-1.87%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-7.21%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.31%

-0.91%

Volatility

SAWMX vs. PDAVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX) is 2.42%, while PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that SAWMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAWMXPDAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

4.65%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.81%

10.17%

-4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

12.12%

-4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

10.51%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.09%

10.50%

+0.59%

SAWMX vs. PDAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PDAVX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAWMX vs. PDAVX - Dividend Comparison

SAWMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than PDAVX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PDAVX
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
1.63%1.74%2.35%2.74%0.00%5.28%1.19%1.38%2.54%5.75%0.00%
SAWMX
SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund
5.38%5.95%3.34%4.20%8.36%4.52%4.88%5.66%6.82%1.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAWMX and PDAVX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDAVX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to SAWMX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAWMX dropped -30.56% vs PDAVX's -25.58%.

SAWMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAWMX and PDAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer