PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAUG vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAUG vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUG achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 6.71% return.


SAUG

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.22%
YTD
8.49%
6M
7.47%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLRI

1D
1.31%
1M
1.23%
YTD
6.71%
6M
7.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAUG vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SAUG and XLRI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAUG vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUG
SAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUG vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAUGXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

SAUG vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAUG vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUG drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUG and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAUGXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-7.12%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.54%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-1.65%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

Volatility

SAUG vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAUGXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.48%

10.99%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.72%

10.99%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.72%

10.99%

+0.73%

SAUG vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAUG vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

SAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.24%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAUG and XLRI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SAUG.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 0.00% for SAUG.

SAUG is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SAUG and 0.35% for XLRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAUG and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer