SAUG vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. SAUG charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULQ.

Performance

SAUG vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SAUG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 6M: 7.95%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAUG vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August	4.37%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

Return for Risk

SAUG vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUG

SAUG Risk / Return Rank: 72
SAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUG vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAUG	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAUG	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	—	—

Drawdowns

SAUG vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUG drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUG and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAUG	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.62%	0.00%	-14.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	0.00%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SAUG	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.59%	0.00%	+9.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.81%	0.00%	+11.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.81%	0.00%	+11.81%

SAUG vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAUG vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SAUG nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, SAUG or JULQ?

On fees, JULQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAUG or JULQ?

JULQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAUG or JULQ?

SAUG and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SAUG and JULQ?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SAUG and 0.79% for JULQ.