PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SASU.L vs. DH2O.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SASU.L achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than DH2O.L's 4.37% return.


SASU.L

1D
-1.40%
1M
-0.64%
6M
7.91%
YTD
8.44%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*

DH2O.L

1D
0.08%
1M
4.00%
6M
1.18%
YTD
4.37%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SASU.L
iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.44%17.83%26.90%30.69%-21.34%28.26%22.00%31.02%-8.81%
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.37%17.60%4.29%13.57%-20.83%30.67%15.22%33.60%-4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SASU.L and DH2O.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SASU.L and DH2O.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SASU.L
SASU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SASU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SASU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SASU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SASU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SASU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DH2O.L
DH2O.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SASU.LDH2O.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.10

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

0.72

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

1.66

+6.64

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SASU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SASU.L and DH2O.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SASU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.07%, smaller than the maximum DH2O.L drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASU.L and DH2O.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SASU.LDH2O.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.07%

-56.90%

+22.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-10.53%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.83%

-16.08%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-32.43%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-3.63%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-10.39%

+4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

4.58%

-2.18%

Volatility

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) is 3.34%, while iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that SASU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DH2O.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SASU.LDH2O.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

4.28%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

10.90%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

13.64%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.75%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

16.48%

+1.91%

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SASU.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DH2O.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SASU.L vs. DH2O.L - Dividend Comparison

SASU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.34%1.33%1.06%1.18%1.09%1.66%0.94%1.39%1.80%1.46%1.76%1.65%
SASU.L
iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SASU.L and DH2O.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SASU.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SASU.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DH2O.L.

SASU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DH2O.L is Global Equities. SASU.L tracks MSCI USA Screened Index, while DH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SASU.L and 0.65% for DH2O.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SASU.L and DH2O.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer