SASS vs. TOT
SASS (M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF) and TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SASS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for TOT.
Performance
SASS vs. TOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SASS
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SASS vs. TOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SASS M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF | 2.04% |
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SASS and TOT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SASS vs. TOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) and LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SASS vs. TOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SASS drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, which is greater than TOT's maximum drawdown of -4.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASS and TOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SASS | TOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -4.26% | -5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -0.62% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -1.45% | -2.06% |
Volatility
SASS vs. TOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SASS | TOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.53% | 14.24% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 14.24% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 14.24% | +3.29% |
SASS vs. TOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SASS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TOT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SASS vs. TOT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SASS nor TOT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SASS and TOT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SASS.
SASS and TOT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: M.D. Sass and LionShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SASS and 0.07% for TOT.
Find the right allocation for SASS and TOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer