SASS vs. STRN
SASS (M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SASS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.
Performance
SASS vs. STRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SASS
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STRN
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 21.56%
- YTD
- 26.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SASS vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SASS M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF | -1.59% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 26.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SASS and STRN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SASS vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SASS vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SASS drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum STRN drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASS and STRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SASS | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -15.43% | +5.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -3.67% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -2.92% | -0.59% |
Volatility
SASS vs. STRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SASS | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.53% | 26.65% | -9.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 26.65% | -9.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 26.65% | -9.12% |
SASS vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SASS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SASS vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison
SASS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SASS M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SASS and STRN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STRN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STRN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SASS.
STRN has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for SASS.
They also come from different issuers: M.D. Sass and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SASS and 0.59% for STRN.
Find the right allocation for SASS and STRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer