SASMX vs. NBGNX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SASMX (ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund) and NBGNX (Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SASMX returned 12.72%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for NBGNX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SASMX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NBGNX.

Performance

SASMX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SASMX achieves a 17.29% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SASMX has outperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 12.72%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.60% annualized return.

SASMX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 6.14%
• YTD: 17.29%
• 6M: 14.43%
• 1Y: 26.53%
• 3Y*: 15.54%
• 5Y*: 2.31%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

NBGNX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 9.74%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 10.25%
• 3Y*: 7.10%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SASMX vs. NBGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SASMX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund	17.29%	9.52%	12.95%	8.64%	-28.82%	12.11%	43.54%	25.31%	3.77%	24.98%
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund	9.74%	-4.70%	9.04%	15.57%	-19.49%	18.07%	24.86%	29.47%	-6.91%	15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SASMX and NBGNX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998	0.88

The correlation between SASMX and NBGNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SASMX vs. NBGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SASMX

SASMX Risk / Return Rank: 28
SASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
SASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
SASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

NBGNX

NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 10
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SASMX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SASMX	NBGNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	0.73	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	1.21	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.13	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	1.11	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.29	2.94	+4.34

SASMX vs. NBGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SASMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the NBGNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SASMX and NBGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SASMX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SASMX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than NBGNX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASMX and NBGNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SASMX	NBGNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.81%	-51.75%	-3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.85%	-10.77%	-3.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.25%	-27.51%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.19%	-28.33%	-13.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.19%	-34.53%	-7.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.52%	+6.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-7.15%	-6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	4.04%	-0.19%

Volatility

SASMX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) at 4.41%. This indicates that SASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SASMX	NBGNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	4.41%	+2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.53%	11.56%	+4.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.14%	16.32%	+4.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.74%	19.70%	+5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.90%	20.24%	+3.66%

SASMX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SASMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

SASMX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison

SASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.31%, more than NBGNX's 14.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund	14.90%	16.36%	2.15%	3.03%	11.05%	10.92%	3.84%	5.82%	12.24%	13.89%	11.21%	18.52%
SASMX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund	17.31%	20.31%	17.01%	0.43%	0.00%	11.84%	7.04%	7.62%	15.70%	3.55%	3.01%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SASMX and NBGNX in my portfolio?

SASMX and NBGNX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SASMX or NBGNX?

SASMX has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to NBGNX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SASMX dropped -54.81% vs NBGNX's -51.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SASMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.