SASMX vs. FRDPX
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX).
SASMX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 1, 1998. FRDPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 14, 1987.
Performance
SASMX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SASMX vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SASMX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund | -5.57% | 9.52% | 12.95% | 8.64% | -28.82% | 12.11% | 43.54% | 25.31% | 3.77% | 24.98% |
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | -4.58% | 11.96% | 10.92% | 12.10% | -10.69% | 26.62% | 16.29% | 29.83% | -5.27% | 17.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SASMX achieves a -5.57% return, which is significantly lower than FRDPX's -4.58% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: SASMX at 10.53% and FRDPX at 10.53%.
SASMX
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -10.34%
- YTD
- -5.57%
- 6M
- -7.76%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
FRDPX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SASMX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SASMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SASMX vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank
SASMX
FRDPX
SASMX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SASMX | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 0.63 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.78 | 1.03 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.14 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.74 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 3.45 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SASMX | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 0.63 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.50 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.62 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.60 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between SASMX and FRDPX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SASMX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison
SASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.50%, more than FRDPX's 10.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SASMX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund | 21.50% | 20.31% | 17.01% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 11.84% | 7.04% | 7.62% | 15.70% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 1.26% |
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 10.74% | 10.25% | 10.15% | 4.60% | 4.96% | 4.42% | 0.82% | 3.01% | 5.20% | 0.90% | 3.09% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
SASMX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SASMX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than FRDPX's maximum drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASMX and FRDPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SASMX | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -51.57% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -10.54% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.19% | -21.07% | -21.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.19% | -34.89% | -7.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.62% | -7.10% | -9.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.15% | -5.84% | -8.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 2.26% | +1.90% |
Volatility
SASMX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) at 3.46%. This indicates that SASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SASMX | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 3.46% | +4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | 7.49% | +8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.94% | 15.22% | +9.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 15.36% | +9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 17.16% | +6.61% |