PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SASMX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SASMX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SASMX achieves a 17.29% return, which is significantly lower than FECGX's 22.18% return.


SASMX

1D
0.91%
1M
6.14%
YTD
17.29%
6M
14.43%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
12.72%

FECGX

1D
1.17%
1M
5.93%
YTD
22.18%
6M
18.79%
1Y
42.27%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SASMX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SASMX
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund
17.29%9.52%12.95%8.64%-28.82%12.11%43.54%2.83%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
22.18%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SASMX and FECGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.95

The correlation between SASMX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SASMX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SASMX
SASMX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SASMX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SASMXFECGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.95

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

10.57

-3.29

SASMX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SASMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SASMX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SASMX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SASMX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASMX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SASMXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-41.85%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.85%

-14.81%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.25%

-28.45%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.19%

-40.34%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.06%

-15.65%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

4.13%

-0.28%

Volatility

SASMX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) is 6.64%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that SASMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SASMXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

7.66%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

16.76%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.14%

22.23%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.74%

24.70%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

27.21%

-3.31%

SASMX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SASMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SASMX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

SASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.31%, more than FECGX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.44%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SASMX
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund
17.31%20.31%17.01%0.43%0.00%11.84%7.04%7.62%15.70%3.55%3.01%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SASMX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FECGX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to SASMX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SASMX dropped -54.81% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

FECGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SASMX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer