SASMX vs. CMCIX
SASMX (ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, SASMX returned 25.88% vs 0.07% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SASMX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
SASMX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SASMX achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 1.72% return.
SASMX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 25.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
CMCIX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 0.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SASMX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SASMX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund | 11.91% | 9.52% | 12.95% | 8.12% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 1.72% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SASMX and CMCIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SASMX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SASMX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
SASMX
CMCIX
SASMX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SASMX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | -0.02 | +1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 0.08 | +1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.01 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | -0.04 | +1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | -0.09 | +6.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SASMX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | -0.02 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.32 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SASMX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SASMX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASMX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SASMX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -21.50% | -33.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.85% | -11.68% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -10.79% | +9.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.09% | -6.44% | -7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 4.98% | -1.15% |
Volatility
SASMX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.89%. This indicates that SASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SASMX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 3.89% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 10.55% | +5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.40% | 15.16% | +5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 16.55% | +8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 16.55% | +7.29% |
SASMX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SASMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
SASMX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
SASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.14%, more than CMCIX's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.18% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SASMX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund | 18.14% | 20.31% | 17.01% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 11.84% | 7.04% | 7.62% | 15.70% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SASMX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SASMX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to CMCIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SASMX dropped -54.81% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
SASMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SASMX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer