SARK vs. TZA
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while TZA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (-300%). SARK is actively managed, while TZA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -26.33%/yr vs -42.78%/yr for TZA. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for TZA.
Performance
SARK vs. TZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.50% return, which is significantly higher than TZA's -45.77% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 3.71%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- -6.50%
- 1Y
- -12.55%
- 3Y*
- -26.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TZA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -32.12%
- YTD
- -45.77%
- 1Y
- -62.64%
- 3Y*
- -42.78%
- 5Y*
- -33.32%
- 10Y*
- -42.81%
SARK vs. TZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.50% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 24.05% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -45.77% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 30.21% | 22.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and TZA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SARK and TZA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. TZA — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
TZA
SARK vs. TZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | TZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.80 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | -0.93 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -1.42 | +0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. TZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum TZA drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and TZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | TZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -100.00% | +18.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.34% | -67.34% | +41.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -89.50% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.36% | -100.00% | +20.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.24% | -98.00% | +50.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.03% | 44.18% | -29.15% |
Volatility
SARK vs. TZA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) is 8.83%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) has a volatility of 11.24%. This indicates that SARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | TZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 11.24% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.97% | 42.46% | -15.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.11% | 57.67% | -21.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.89% | 67.48% | -11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.89% | 68.78% | -12.89% |
SARK vs. TZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TZA's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. TZA - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than TZA's 4.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.01% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 4.89% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and TZA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TZA has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to SARK (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs TZA's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, SARK leads with -26.33% vs -42.78% for TZA. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SARK has performed better with a -26.33% return vs -42.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TZA has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 3.01% for SARK.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TZA is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 1.11% for TZA.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and TZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer