SARK vs. SHRT
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SARK returned -14.81% vs -16.29% for SHRT. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SHRT.
Performance
SARK vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly higher than SHRT's -15.36% return.
SARK
- 1D
- -4.39%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 1Y
- -14.81%
- 3Y*
- -28.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.60%
SHRT
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -11.22%
- YTD
- -15.36%
- 1Y
- -16.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -8.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.02M | $4.74M | $6.36M | |
| $279.21K | $134.73K | $63.81K |
SARK vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -7.36% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -23.67% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -15.36% | -0.91% | -1.44% | -5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and SHRT is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
SHRT
SARK vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.82 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | -0.77 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | -1.63 | +0.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -27.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and SHRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -27.84% | -53.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.34% | -21.19% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.55% | -24.10% | -55.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.59% | -9.09% | -38.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 9.99% | +4.78% |
Volatility
SARK vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 3.52%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 3.52% | +8.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.06% | 12.01% | +16.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.50% | 14.18% | +22.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 13.00% | +42.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 13.00% | +42.76% |
SARK vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than SHRT's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.04% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and SHRT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to SHRT (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs SHRT's -27.84%.
On 1-year performance, SARK leads with -14.81% vs -16.29% for SHRT. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SARK has performed better with a -14.81% return vs -16.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.08% for SHRT.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 1.35% for SHRT.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and SHRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer