SARK vs. RINC
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. SARK is actively managed, while RINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RINC.
Performance
SARK vs. RINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK vs. RINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -23.63% |
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF | 0.00% | 7.75% | -5.74% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and RINC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023 | -0.39 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SARK and RINC has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.39 to -0.06, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. RINC — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
RINC
SARK vs. RINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SARK | RINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SARK | RINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SARK vs. RINC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | RINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.42% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.46% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.47% | — | — |
Volatility
SARK vs. RINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | RINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.91% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.24% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.24% | — | — |
SARK vs. RINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RINC's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. RINC - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than RINC's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF | 2.16% | 6.04% | 10.85% | 3.88% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and RINC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RINC.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 2.16% for RINC.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while RINC is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.89% for RINC.
Find the right allocation for SARK and RINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer