SARK vs. FAD
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and FAD (First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while FAD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index. SARK is actively managed, while FAD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -28.52%/yr vs 22.28%/yr for FAD. Their -0.77 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FAD.
Performance
SARK vs. FAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than FAD's 18.41% return.
SARK
- 1D
- -4.39%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 1Y
- -14.81%
- 3Y*
- -28.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.60%
FAD
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- YTD
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 27.40%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.58M | $2.92M | $2.76M | |
| $5.02M | $4.74M | $6.36M |
SARK vs. FAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -7.36% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 24.05% |
FAD First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 18.41% | 17.23% | 23.85% | 19.07% | -24.06% | -4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and FAD is -0.80, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | -0.77 |
The correlation between SARK and FAD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. FAD — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
FAD
SARK vs. FAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | FAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.23 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 2.58 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 7.95 | -8.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. FAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than FAD's maximum drawdown of -54.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and FAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | FAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -54.33% | -26.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.34% | -10.66% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -23.55% | -50.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.55% | -4.21% | -75.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.59% | -9.59% | -38.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 3.46% | +11.31% |
Volatility
SARK vs. FAD - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) at 6.56%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | FAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 6.56% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.06% | 16.54% | +11.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.50% | 20.65% | +15.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 20.92% | +34.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 21.38% | +34.38% |
SARK vs. FAD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FAD's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. FAD - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than FAD's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.59% | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.09% | 0.32% | 0.48% | 0.20% | 0.22% | 0.64% | 0.41% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.04% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and FAD have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to FAD (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs FAD's -54.33%.
On 3-year performance, FAD leads with 22.28% vs -28.52% for SARK. On fees, FAD is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FAD has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FAD has performed better with a 22.28% return vs -28.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAD is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.09% for FAD.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FAD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.63% for FAD.
FAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and FAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer