SAOAX vs. BIVIX
SAOAX (Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund) and BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, SAOAX returned 5.68%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for BIVIX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SAOAX charges 1.76%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for BIVIX.
Performance
SAOAX vs. BIVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAOAX achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly higher than BIVIX's -18.14% return.
SAOAX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 12.71%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 3.59%
BIVIX
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- -18.14%
- 6M
- -16.10%
- 1Y
- -11.54%
- 3Y*
- -5.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
SAOAX vs. BIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund | 12.71% | -2.00% | 10.49% | 8.81% | -8.66% | 14.38% | 0.17% | -2.26% | -11.25% | 7.69% |
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -18.14% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAOAX and BIVIX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SAOAX and BIVIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAOAX vs. BIVIX — Risk / Return Rank
SAOAX
BIVIX
SAOAX vs. BIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) and Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAOAX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.95 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | -0.43 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | -1.27 | +8.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAOAX vs. BIVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAOAX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, which is greater than BIVIX's maximum drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAOAX and BIVIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAOAX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.28% | -26.95% | -25.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -26.95% | +21.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.90% | -26.95% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.90% | -26.95% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -23.29% | +18.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.69% | -5.97% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 9.13% | -7.17% |
Volatility
SAOAX vs. BIVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) is 3.96%, while Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that SAOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAOAX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 13.54% | -9.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 22.64% | -15.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.23% | 26.73% | -17.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.74% | 17.35% | +11.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 17.48% | +3.70% |
SAOAX vs. BIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAOAX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BIVIX's 3.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAOAX vs. BIVIX - Dividend Comparison
SAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than BIVIX's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.68% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund | 0.63% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 0.62% | 0.72% | 0.82% | 1.22% | 0.92% | 1.17% | 7.07% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAOAX and BIVIX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to SAOAX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAOAX dropped -52.28% vs BIVIX's -26.95%.
SAOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAOAX and BIVIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer