PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMT vs. USPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMT vs. USPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMT achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 9.67% return.


SAMT

1D
0.47%
1M
-5.73%
6M
8.34%
YTD
12.63%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.23%

USPX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.02%
6M
8.24%
YTD
9.67%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
12.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.05M$5.51M$7.81M
$3.15M$2.94M$3.73M

SAMT vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
12.63%33.10%28.15%1.27%-6.30%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
9.67%17.78%24.97%27.07%-14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMT and USPX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2022

0.79

The correlation between SAMT and USPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAMT vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAMT
USPX

Industrials

21.8%
7.9%

Technology

20.4%
37.4%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
4.7%

Healthcare

10.4%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
8.8%

Communication Services

6.0%
9.6%

Financial Services

4.8%
12.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.7%

Utilities

4.2%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.8%

Energy

2.0%
3.4%

Industrials

SAMT
21.8%
USPX
7.9%

Technology

SAMT
20.4%
USPX
37.4%

Consumer Defensive

SAMT
15.4%
USPX
4.7%

Healthcare

SAMT
10.4%
USPX
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SAMT
8.4%
USPX
8.8%

Communication Services

SAMT
6.0%
USPX
9.6%

Financial Services

SAMT
4.8%
USPX
12.5%

Basic Materials

SAMT
4.2%
USPX
1.7%

Utilities

SAMT
4.2%
USPX
2.6%

Real Estate

SAMT
2.4%
USPX
1.8%

Energy

SAMT
2.0%
USPX
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMT vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAMT
SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

USPX
USPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
USPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
USPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAMT vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAMTUSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.04

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

8.56

-2.53

SAMT vs. USPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the USPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMT and USPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAMT vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMT drawdown since its inception was -20.57%, smaller than the maximum USPX drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMT and USPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMTUSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.57%

-31.21%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.15%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.27%

-19.21%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.13%

-1.63%

-7.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-4.40%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.18%

+1.60%

Volatility

SAMT vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison

Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) have volatilities of 3.43% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMTUSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.39%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

10.23%

+4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

13.02%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

16.30%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

15.97%

+1.14%

SAMT vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMT vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison

SAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than USPX's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
0.62%0.70%1.40%1.49%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
1.09%1.07%1.23%1.35%2.21%2.40%2.51%3.07%2.91%2.60%4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMT and USPX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMT has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to USPX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMT dropped -20.57% vs USPX's -31.21%.

On 3-year performance, SAMT leads with 23.90% vs 19.24% for USPX. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SAMT has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 19.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SAMT.

USPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.62% for SAMT.

They also come from different issuers: Strategas and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SAMT and 0.03% for USPX.

USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMT and USPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer