PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMT vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMT vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMT achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.62% return.


SAMT

1D
0.39%
1M
0.96%
YTD
19.97%
6M
17.75%
1Y
39.83%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
10Y*

MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMT vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
19.97%33.10%7.49%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
1.62%4.13%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMT and MMKT is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMT vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMT
SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMT vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAMTMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-59.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

15.54

-14.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

152.72

-147.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.25

913.70

-900.45

SAMT vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 16.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMT and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAMT vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMT drawdown since its inception was -20.57%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMT and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMTMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.57%

-0.04%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-0.02%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

0.00%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-0.00%

-7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

0.00%

+3.01%

Volatility

SAMT vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that SAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMTMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

0.05%

+6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

0.13%

+13.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

0.23%

+17.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

0.23%

+16.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

0.23%

+16.84%

SAMT vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMT vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

SAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than MMKT's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.71%3.98%1.07%0.00%0.00%
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
0.58%0.70%1.40%1.49%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMT and MMKT have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMT has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMT dropped -20.57% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

On 1-year performance, SAMT leads with 39.83% vs 3.79% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SAMT has performed better with a 39.83% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SAMT.

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.58% for SAMT.

SAMT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Strategas and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SAMT and 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.76 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMT and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer