SAM.TO vs. SILJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Starcore International Mines Ltd. (SAM.TO) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ).
SILJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Junior Silver Miners & Explorers Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2012.
Performance
SAM.TO vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SAM.TO vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAM.TO Starcore International Mines Ltd. | -22.46% | 661.54% | 30.00% | -33.33% | -34.78% | -24.59% | 258.82% | -10.53% | -66.67% | -49.11% |
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF | 8.86% | 170.87% | 15.53% | -7.29% | -9.39% | -23.90% | 30.75% | 49.34% | -21.84% | -11.66% |
Different Trading Currencies
SAM.TO is traded in CAD, while SILJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SILJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAM.TO achieves a -22.46% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SAM.TO has underperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 6.60%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
SAM.TO
- 1D
- 10.14%
- 1M
- -38.71%
- YTD
- -22.46%
- 6M
- 70.58%
- 1Y
- 283.80%
- 3Y*
- 60.69%
- 5Y*
- 25.66%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
SILJ
- 1D
- 8.70%
- 1M
- -24.80%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 31.02%
- 1Y
- 141.51%
- 3Y*
- 44.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAM.TO vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
SAM.TO
SILJ
SAM.TO vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Starcore International Mines Ltd. (SAM.TO) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAM.TO | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 2.67 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 2.80 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | 4.10 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.75 | 13.99 | +2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAM.TO | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.67 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.47 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.35 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.15 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between SAM.TO and SILJ is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SAM.TO vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
SAM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAM.TO Starcore International Mines Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.86% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
SAM.TO vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAM.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.97%, which is greater than SILJ's maximum drawdown of -69.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAM.TO and SILJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAM.TO | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.97% | -79.04% | -19.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.37% | -34.71% | -23.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.88% | -56.09% | -16.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.44% | -70.06% | -24.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.13% | -26.25% | -57.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.22% | -41.67% | -39.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.15% | 10.16% | +7.99% |
Volatility
SAM.TO vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
Starcore International Mines Ltd. (SAM.TO) has a higher volatility of 37.99% compared to ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) at 21.33%. This indicates that SAM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAM.TO | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.99% | 21.33% | +16.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 82.60% | 45.68% | +36.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.82% | 53.28% | +57.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.87% | 41.29% | +75.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.88% | 44.21% | +67.67% |