SAH vs. TWLO
SAH (Sonic Automotive, Inc.) and TWLO (Twilio Inc.) are both stocks. SAH operates in Auto & Truck Dealerships (Consumer Cyclical), while TWLO operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, SAH returned 19.73%/yr vs 21.49%/yr for TWLO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SAH vs. TWLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SAH having a 35.20% return and TWLO slightly lower at 34.20%. Over the past 10 years, SAH has underperformed TWLO with an annualized return of 19.73%, while TWLO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.49% annualized return.
SAH
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 35.20%
- 6M
- 30.01%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 23.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
TWLO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 34.20%
- 6M
- 36.04%
- 1Y
- 59.31%
- 3Y*
- 44.34%
- 5Y*
- -13.03%
- 10Y*
- 21.49%
SAH vs. TWLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAH Sonic Automotive, Inc. | 35.20% | -0.27% | 15.18% | 16.72% | 1.93% | 29.41% | 26.06% | 129.24% | -24.45% | -18.62% |
TWLO Twilio Inc. | 34.20% | 31.61% | 42.45% | 54.96% | -81.41% | -22.20% | 244.42% | 10.06% | 278.39% | -18.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAH and TWLO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2016 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SAH and TWLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SAH:
$2.81B
TWLO:
$30.11B
SAH:
$3.17
TWLO:
$0.66
SAH:
26.13
TWLO:
288.74
SAH:
0.19
TWLO:
5.66
SAH:
2.87
TWLO:
3.87
SAH:
$15.19B
TWLO:
$5.30B
SAH:
$2.25B
TWLO:
$2.59B
SAH:
$517.70M
TWLO:
$304.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAH vs. TWLO — Risk / Return Rank
SAH
TWLO
SAH vs. TWLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH) and Twilio Inc. (TWLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAH | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.23 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 1.96 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | 4.30 | -4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAH vs. TWLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAH drawdown since its inception was -97.17%, which is greater than TWLO's maximum drawdown of -90.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAH and TWLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAH | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.17% | -90.36% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.64% | -30.34% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.64% | -45.17% | +11.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | -89.57% | +51.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.80% | -90.36% | +19.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -56.96% | +52.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.03% | -49.53% | +15.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.23% | 13.82% | +7.41% |
Volatility
SAH vs. TWLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH) is 11.52%, while Twilio Inc. (TWLO) has a volatility of 22.40%. This indicates that SAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAH | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.52% | 22.40% | -10.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.46% | 43.58% | -17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.07% | 60.66% | -20.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.05% | 59.27% | -17.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.54% | 60.62% | -13.08% |
Dividends
SAH vs. TWLO - Dividend Comparison
SAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, while TWLO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAH Sonic Automotive, Inc. | 1.87% | 2.36% | 1.97% | 2.06% | 2.09% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.29% | 1.74% | 1.08% | 0.87% | 0.49% |
TWLO Twilio Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SAH vs. TWLO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sonic Automotive, Inc. and Twilio Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SAH vs. TWLO - Profitability Comparison
SAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonic Automotive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 560.10M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.2%.
TWLO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported a gross profit of 684.24M and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.6%.
SAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonic Automotive, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.10M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.
TWLO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported an operating income of 107.67M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
SAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonic Automotive, Inc. reported a net income of 60.80M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
TWLO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported a net income of 90.14M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAH and TWLO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TWLO has higher volatility (22.40%) compared to SAH (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAH dropped -97.17% vs TWLO's -90.36%.
TWLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAH and TWLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer