SAGWX vs. TGVFX
SAGWX (Touchstone Small Company Fund) and TGVFX (Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - SAGWX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Touchstone, while TGVFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Touchstone. Over the past 10 years, SAGWX returned 12.13%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for TGVFX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAGWX charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for TGVFX.
Performance
SAGWX vs. TGVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAGWX achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly higher than TGVFX's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SAGWX has underperformed TGVFX with an annualized return of 12.13%, while TGVFX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.76% annualized return.
SAGWX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 8.87%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
TGVFX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
SAGWX vs. TGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAGWX Touchstone Small Company Fund | 8.87% | 9.58% | 13.32% | 15.71% | -14.64% | 22.83% | 17.58% | 29.44% | -8.42% | 17.32% |
TGVFX Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund | 2.24% | 17.61% | 32.50% | 42.73% | -28.62% | 22.55% | 33.12% | 72.37% | -4.05% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAGWX and TGVFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SAGWX and TGVFX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAGWX vs. TGVFX — Risk / Return Rank
SAGWX
TGVFX
SAGWX vs. TGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Small Company Fund (SAGWX) and Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund (TGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAGWX | TGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.12 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.99 | 3.70 | +3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAGWX vs. TGVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAGWX drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, smaller than the maximum TGVFX drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAGWX and TGVFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAGWX | TGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.87% | -69.41% | +17.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.60% | -16.01% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.69% | -23.50% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.07% | -40.77% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.75% | -40.77% | -0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.36% | +6.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -22.68% | +13.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 4.84% | -1.96% |
Volatility
SAGWX vs. TGVFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Small Company Fund (SAGWX) is 3.82%, while Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund (TGVFX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that SAGWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAGWX | TGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 6.11% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 12.74% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.46% | 16.77% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 24.12% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 23.56% | -0.94% |
SAGWX vs. TGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAGWX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TGVFX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAGWX vs. TGVFX - Dividend Comparison
SAGWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than TGVFX's 18.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAGWX Touchstone Small Company Fund | 5.35% | 5.82% | 6.03% | 0.15% | 2.57% | 19.71% | 0.10% | 11.83% | 14.83% | 9.03% | 8.71% | 21.16% |
TGVFX Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund | 18.82% | 19.24% | 6.16% | 2.66% | 2.40% | 17.21% | 10.29% | 34.44% | 11.32% | 9.98% | 3.67% | 10.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAGWX and TGVFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGVFX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to SAGWX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAGWX dropped -51.87% vs TGVFX's -69.41%.
SAGWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAGWX and TGVFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer