PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAEU.L is traded in GBP, while LDEG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDEG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAEU.L achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.


SAEU.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.09%
YTD
6.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*

LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.38%
YTD
10.41%
6M
13.94%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SAEU.L
iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.49%24.54%4.11%15.10%-5.84%7.26%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SAEU.L and LDEG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.73

The correlation between SAEU.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAEU.L
LDEG.L

Financial Services

27.0%
41.5%

Industrials

19.3%
15.8%

Healthcare

14.8%
3.4%

Technology

9.9%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
3.3%

Utilities

5.5%
8.2%

Basic Materials

5.1%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
3.1%

Communication Services

4.0%
5.2%

Energy

2.7%
7.7%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Financial Services

SAEU.L
27.0%
LDEG.L
41.5%

Industrials

SAEU.L
19.3%
LDEG.L
15.8%

Healthcare

SAEU.L
14.8%
LDEG.L
3.4%

Technology

SAEU.L
9.9%
LDEG.L
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SAEU.L
5.9%
LDEG.L
3.3%

Utilities

SAEU.L
5.5%
LDEG.L
8.2%

Basic Materials

SAEU.L
5.1%
LDEG.L
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

SAEU.L
4.8%
LDEG.L
3.1%

Communication Services

SAEU.L
4.0%
LDEG.L
5.2%

Energy

SAEU.L
2.7%
LDEG.L
7.7%

Real Estate

SAEU.L
0.9%
LDEG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAEU.L
SAEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SAEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SAEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAEU.LLDEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.78

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

13.82

-7.79

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAEU.L and LDEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAEU.LLDEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.63

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.24

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.24

-0.62

Drawdowns

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAEU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.68%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEU.L and LDEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAEU.LLDEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.68%

-15.97%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-8.04%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-12.05%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-15.97%

-1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.33%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-2.95%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.20%

+0.91%

Volatility

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that SAEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAEU.LLDEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.57%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

9.21%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

11.55%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.24%

15.99%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

16.01%

+0.73%

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SAEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison

SAEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%
SAEU.L
iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAEU.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SAEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SAEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

SAEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAEU.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAEU.L and LDEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer