PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SACH vs. GPMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SACH vs. GPMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) and Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SACH achieves a 81.93% return, which is significantly higher than GPMT's -43.04% return.


SACH

1D
-2.26%
1M
49.20%
YTD
81.93%
6M
81.93%
1Y
86.96%
3Y*
-7.13%
5Y*
-8.36%
10Y*

GPMT

1D
-6.38%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-43.04%
6M
-42.55%
1Y
-40.12%
3Y*
-30.22%
5Y*
-31.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SACH vs. GPMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
81.93%-9.17%-60.54%29.48%-35.83%52.67%7.94%19.39%15.66%-13.56%
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
-43.04%-7.03%-49.00%28.79%-48.31%26.55%-41.53%11.51%11.09%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SACH and GPMT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SACH:

$43.40M

GPMT:

$62.93M

EPS

SACH:

-$0.04

GPMT:

-$0.85

PS Ratio

SACH:

1.29

GPMT:

0.47

PB Ratio

SACH:

0.26

GPMT:

0.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

SACH:

$33.56M

GPMT:

$132.94M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SACH:

$32.83M

GPMT:

$74.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

SACH:

$18.86M

GPMT:

$16.09M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SACH vs. GPMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SACH
SACH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SACH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SACH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SACH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SACH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SACH Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GPMT
GPMT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GPMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPMT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GPMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPMT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SACH vs. GPMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) and Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SACHGPMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.86

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

-0.73

+3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

-1.32

+8.25

SACH vs. GPMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SACH Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the GPMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SACH and GPMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SACH vs. GPMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SACH drawdown since its inception was -80.30%, smaller than the maximum GPMT drawdown of -87.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACH and GPMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SACHGPMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.30%

-87.96%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.54%

-54.89%

+27.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.73%

-74.35%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.30%

-85.73%

+5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.25%

-86.91%

+36.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.78%

-40.82%

+11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.59%

30.41%

-17.82%

Volatility

SACH vs. GPMT - Volatility Comparison

Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) has a higher volatility of 67.91% compared to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) at 11.67%. This indicates that SACH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SACHGPMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

67.91%

11.67%

+56.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.52%

36.85%

+39.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.68%

45.94%

+58.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.04%

43.83%

+17.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.09%

85.52%

-27.43%

Dividends

SACH vs. GPMT - Dividend Comparison

SACH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.74%, more than GPMT's 15.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
15.15%8.33%10.75%13.47%17.72%8.54%6.51%9.14%8.99%3.95%
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
71.74%19.23%17.78%12.83%15.76%8.22%11.54%8.29%15.60%6.60%

Financials

SACH vs. GPMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sachem Capital Corp. and Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M202220232024202520260
26.04M
(SACH) Total Revenue
(GPMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SACH and GPMT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SACH has higher volatility (67.91%) compared to GPMT (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SACH dropped -80.30% vs GPMT's -87.96%.

SACH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SACH and GPMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer