SABTX vs. FGIPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SABTX (SA U.S. Value Fund) and FGIPX (Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SABTX returned 12.00%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for FGIPX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SABTX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FGIPX.

Performance

SABTX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SABTX having a 18.98% return and FGIPX slightly lower at 18.94%. Over the past 10 years, SABTX has underperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 12.00%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.59% annualized return.

SABTX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 18.98%
• 6M: 18.21%
• 1Y: 35.90%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 11.79%
• 10Y*: 12.00%

FGIPX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 18.94%
• 6M: 17.96%
• 1Y: 43.07%
• 3Y*: 26.61%
• 5Y*: 17.35%
• 10Y*: 13.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SABTX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SABTX SA U.S. Value Fund	18.98%	17.69%	11.32%	11.82%	-6.35%	27.06%	-2.04%	24.85%	-12.14%	18.45%
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	18.94%	30.18%	15.44%	12.17%	3.28%	21.73%	-4.59%	25.96%	-9.95%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SABTX and FGIPX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013	0.92

The correlation between SABTX and FGIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SABTX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SABTX

SABTX Risk / Return Rank: 95
SABTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SABTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SABTX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SABTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SABTX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FGIPX

FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SABTX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SABTX	FGIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.44	3.76	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.76	5.15	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.68	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.46	6.12	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.28	23.24	+0.04

SABTX vs. FGIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SABTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is comparable to the FGIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SABTX and FGIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SABTX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SABTX drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than FGIPX's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABTX and FGIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SABTX	FGIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.96%	-37.32%	-29.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.36%	-7.26%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.63%	-13.27%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.42%	-16.19%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.00%	-37.32%	-4.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.94%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-4.16%	-7.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	1.90%	-0.16%

Volatility

SABTX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison

SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) have volatilities of 3.92% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SABTX	FGIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	4.09%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.63%	8.76%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	11.84%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.37%	14.92%	+1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.19%	17.14%	+2.05%

SABTX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SABTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

SABTX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison

SABTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than FGIPX's 9.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	9.56%	11.68%	12.69%	7.50%	7.35%	12.20%	2.13%	52.72%	25.63%	5.58%	4.22%	5.88%
SABTX SA U.S. Value Fund	3.26%	3.88%	2.60%	1.67%	7.66%	4.25%	1.52%	5.14%	9.80%	10.36%	5.08%	6.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SABTX and FGIPX in my portfolio?

SABTX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SABTX or FGIPX?

FGIPX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to SABTX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SABTX dropped -66.96% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 3.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.