SABIX vs. FRGAX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX).

SABIX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Dec 28, 2017. FRGAX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 1, 2022.

Performance

SABIX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SABIX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SABIX Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio	-3.06%	13.01%	12.49%	15.20%	-2.27%
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund	-1.44%	17.10%	12.91%	17.57%	-1.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SABIX achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's -1.44% return.

SABIX

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: -3.06%
• 6M: -1.49%
• 1Y: 12.33%
• 3Y*: 11.25%
• 5Y*: 6.26%
• 10Y*: —

FRGAX

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -1.44%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SABIX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SABIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.

SABIX

Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio

FRGAX

Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund

Return for Risk

SABIX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SABIX

SABIX Risk / Return Rank: 41
SABIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SABIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SABIX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SABIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SABIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FRGAX

FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SABIX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SABIX	FRGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	1.33	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.93	-0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.28	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	1.74	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.39	7.96	-2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SABIX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SABIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SABIX and FRGAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SABIX	FRGAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	1.33	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.27	-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between SABIX and FRGAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SABIX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

SABIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.14%, more than FRGAX's 2.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SABIX Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio	10.14%	9.83%	3.12%	2.81%	7.12%	9.63%	1.82%	3.72%	3.06%
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund	2.03%	2.00%	2.01%	1.77%	1.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SABIX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SABIX drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABIX and FRGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SABIX	FRGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.06%	-11.77%	-17.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-8.53%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.70%	-5.02%	-0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-1.62%	-2.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	1.87%	+0.24%

Volatility

SABIX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) at 4.51%. This indicates that SABIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SABIX	FRGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	4.51%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.14%	7.04%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.64%	12.09%	+1.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.40%	10.33%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.37%	10.33%	+4.04%