SAB.MC vs. LRN

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SAB.MC (Banco de Sabadell S.A) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. SAB.MC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SAB.MC returned 14.29%/yr vs 23.41%/yr for LRN. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SAB.MC vs. LRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SAB.MC is traded in EUR, while LRN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LRN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAB.MC achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 52.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SAB.MC has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 14.29%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.41% annualized return.

SAB.MC

• 1D: 4.24%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: -0.78%
• 6M: 4.10%
• 1Y: 25.41%
• 3Y*: 58.67%
• 5Y*: 46.51%
• 10Y*: 14.29%

LRN

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 11.51%
• YTD: 52.80%
• 6M: 53.73%
• 1Y: -31.89%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: 27.43%
• 10Y*: 23.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAB.MC vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAB.MC Banco de Sabadell S.A	-0.78%	95.56%	80.12%	32.15%	58.09%	67.18%	-64.45%	8.30%	-36.46%	29.25%
LRN Stride, Inc.	52.80%	-44.94%	86.61%	84.11%	-0.33%	68.74%	-4.27%	-16.06%	63.23%	-18.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SAB.MC and LRN is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007	0.10

The correlation between SAB.MC and LRN shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SAB.MC vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAB.MC

SAB.MC Risk / Return Rank: 67
SAB.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SAB.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
SAB.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SAB.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SAB.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

LRN

LRN Risk / Return Rank: 27
LRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LRN Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
LRN Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAB.MC vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAB.MC	LRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	-0.47	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	-0.10	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.98	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	-0.49	+2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.79	-0.74	+4.53

SAB.MC vs. LRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAB.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the LRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAB.MC and LRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAB.MC vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAB.MC drawdown since its inception was -89.47%, which is greater than LRN's maximum drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAB.MC and LRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAB.MC	LRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.47%	-76.40%	-13.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.62%	-64.09%	+50.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.83%	-64.09%	+45.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.02%	-64.09%	+27.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.98%	-64.09%	-20.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.19%	-42.12%	+37.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.48%	-32.94%	-12.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.93%	42.25%	-36.32%

Volatility

SAB.MC vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison

Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Stride, Inc. (LRN) at 8.19%. This indicates that SAB.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAB.MC	LRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.61%	8.19%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.07%	24.85%	-3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.91%	66.97%	-38.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.22%	51.90%	-15.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.66%	49.69%	-8.03%

Dividends

SAB.MC vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison

SAB.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.47%, while LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRN Stride, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SAB.MC Banco de Sabadell S.A	18.47%	7.85%	5.85%	4.50%	5.68%	0.00%	5.65%	0.93%	7.00%	3.02%	5.07%	2.38%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAB.MC and LRN in my portfolio?

SAB.MC and LRN have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.