PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) and Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAB.MC is traded in EUR, while LOOMIS.ST is traded in SEK. To make them comparable, the LOOMIS.ST values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAB.MC achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than LOOMIS.ST's 23.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SAB.MC has outperformed LOOMIS.ST with an annualized return of 14.29%, while LOOMIS.ST has yielded a comparatively lower 10.33% annualized return.


SAB.MC

1D
4.24%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
4.10%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
58.67%
5Y*
46.51%
10Y*
14.29%

LOOMIS.ST

1D
0.96%
1M
2.72%
YTD
23.54%
6M
31.23%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAB.MC
Banco de Sabadell S.A
-0.78%95.56%80.12%32.15%58.09%67.18%-64.45%8.30%-36.46%29.25%
LOOMIS.ST
Loomis AB ser. B
23.54%27.91%28.15%-2.47%12.81%7.09%-38.00%37.02%-18.27%26.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SAB.MC and LOOMIS.ST is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2008

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAB.MC
SAB.MC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SAB.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAB.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAB.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SAB.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAB.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LOOMIS.ST
LOOMIS.ST Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LOOMIS.ST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) and Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAB.MCLOOMIS.STDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.63

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

3.64

+0.15

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAB.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the LOOMIS.ST Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAB.MC and LOOMIS.ST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAB.MC drawdown since its inception was -89.47%, which is greater than LOOMIS.ST's maximum drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAB.MC and LOOMIS.ST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAB.MCLOOMIS.STDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.47%

-64.00%

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.62%

-17.59%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

-22.50%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.02%

-29.55%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.98%

-64.00%

-20.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-2.92%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.48%

-14.94%

-30.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

7.85%

-1.92%

Volatility

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST - Volatility Comparison

Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST) at 6.76%. This indicates that SAB.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOOMIS.ST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAB.MCLOOMIS.STDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

6.76%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.07%

20.50%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.91%

25.70%

+3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.22%

29.88%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.66%

33.40%

+8.26%

Dividends

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST - Dividend Comparison

SAB.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.47%, more than LOOMIS.ST's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOOMIS.ST
Loomis AB ser. B
4.29%3.59%3.72%4.48%2.97%2.49%2.43%2.58%3.15%2.32%2.58%2.27%
SAB.MC
Banco de Sabadell S.A
18.47%7.85%5.85%4.50%5.68%0.00%5.65%0.93%7.00%3.02%5.07%2.38%

Financials

SAB.MC vs. LOOMIS.ST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco de Sabadell S.A and Loomis AB ser. B. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SAB.MC values in EUR, LOOMIS.ST values in SEK

Frequently Asked Questions


SAB.MC and LOOMIS.ST have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAB.MC and LOOMIS.ST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer