SAABY vs. DNOPY
SAABY (Saab AB (publ)) and DNOPY (Dino Polska S.A) are both stocks. SAABY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while DNOPY operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, SAABY returned 50.73%/yr vs 4.36%/yr for DNOPY. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SAABY vs. DNOPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAABY achieves a -4.59% return, which is significantly higher than DNOPY's -30.21% return.
SAABY
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- -4.59%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 14.85%
- 3Y*
- 60.00%
- 5Y*
- 50.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DNOPY
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -30.21%
- 6M
- -27.27%
- 1Y
- -40.59%
- 3Y*
- -11.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SAABY vs. DNOPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAABY Saab AB (publ) | -4.59% | 177.56% | 39.85% | 47.07% | 67.28% | -48.79% | 82.51% |
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A | -30.21% | 19.79% | -16.65% | 30.68% | 2.43% | 10.75% | 89.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAABY and DNOPY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
SAABY:
$29.87B
DNOPY:
$7.95B
SAABY:
SEK 5.98
DNOPY:
PLN 1.59
SAABY:
43.63
DNOPY:
18.78
SAABY:
1.33
DNOPY:
1.07
SAABY:
3.43
DNOPY:
0.85
SAABY:
6.32
DNOPY:
3.26
SAABY:
SEK 82.29B
DNOPY:
PLN 34.60B
SAABY:
SEK 17.87B
DNOPY:
PLN 8.12B
SAABY:
SEK 9.44B
DNOPY:
PLN 2.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAABY vs. DNOPY — Risk / Return Rank
SAABY
DNOPY
SAABY vs. DNOPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAABY | DNOPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.83 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | -0.87 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | -1.55 | +2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAABY vs. DNOPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAABY drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than DNOPY's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAABY and DNOPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAABY | DNOPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.75% | -48.35% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.04% | -48.35% | +11.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.04% | -48.35% | +11.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.04% | -48.35% | +11.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.92% | -46.50% | +14.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -14.46% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.01% | 26.94% | -11.93% |
Volatility
SAABY vs. DNOPY - Volatility Comparison
Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) at 10.78%. This indicates that SAABY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNOPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAABY | DNOPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.37% | 10.78% | +4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.13% | 36.91% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.86% | 43.59% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.05% | 58.31% | -11.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.50% | 59.67% | -2.17% |
Dividends
SAABY vs. DNOPY - Dividend Comparison
SAABY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while DNOPY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAABY Saab AB (publ) | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.73% | 0.84% | 1.24% | 2.19% |
Financials
SAABY vs. DNOPY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saab AB (publ) and Dino Polska S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SAABY vs. DNOPY - Profitability Comparison
SAABY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 19.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
DNOPY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 8.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.
SAABY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported an operating income of 1.91B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
DNOPY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported an operating income of 419.22M and revenue of 8.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
SAABY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
DNOPY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported a net income of 315.98M and revenue of 8.44B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAABY and DNOPY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAABY has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to DNOPY (10.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAABY dropped -52.75% vs DNOPY's -48.35%.
SAABY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAABY and DNOPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer