S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L
S7XP.L (Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF) and UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Financials Equities funds - S7XP.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while UIFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L returned 15.50%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for UIFS.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. S7XP.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UIFS.L.
Performance
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S7XP.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L has outperformed UIFS.L with an annualized return of 15.50%, while UIFS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.04% annualized return.
S7XP.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 44.34%
- 5Y*
- 28.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S7XP.L Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF | 4.29% | 94.76% | 25.39% | 26.22% | 6.71% | 30.03% | -18.68% | 10.65% | -30.92% | 19.01% |
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.82% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | 38.07% | -6.59% | 27.05% | -9.40% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between S7XP.L and UIFS.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between S7XP.L and UIFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S7XP.L
UIFS.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
S7XP.L
UIFS.L
Basic Materials
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Communication Services
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Energy
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Healthcare
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Industrials
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
Real Estate
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Technology
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
Utilities
S7XP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
S7XP.L
UIFS.L
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S7XP.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.07 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 0.36 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 0.83 | +7.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S7XP.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 0.33 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.52 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.65 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.62 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S7XP.L drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than UIFS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S7XP.L and UIFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S7XP.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.98% | -35.31% | -27.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.10% | -12.90% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | -18.72% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -18.72% | -16.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.98% | -35.31% | -27.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -6.76% | +4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -6.08% | -13.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 5.53% | -0.33% |
Volatility
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) at 4.41%. This indicates that S7XP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S7XP.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 4.41% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 10.58% | +8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 13.98% | +9.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 17.54% | +8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 20.12% | +7.80% |
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S7XP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
S7XP.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S7XP.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S7XP.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for S7XP.L.
S7XP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for S7XP.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.
Find the right allocation for S7XP.L and UIFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer