S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L
S7XP.L (Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - S7XP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L returned 15.50%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. S7XP.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S7XP.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 15.50%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
S7XP.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 44.34%
- 5Y*
- 28.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S7XP.L Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF | 4.29% | 94.76% | 25.39% | 26.22% | 6.71% | 30.03% | -18.68% | 10.65% | -30.92% | 19.01% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between S7XP.L and SPXP.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2014 | 0.36 |
The correlation between S7XP.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S7XP.L
SPXP.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
S7XP.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Industrials
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Technology
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
S7XP.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
S7XP.L
SPXP.L
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S7XP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.52 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 4.11 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 15.13 | -7.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S7XP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.78 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.06 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 1.10 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.15 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S7XP.L drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S7XP.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S7XP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.98% | -25.46% | -37.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.10% | -7.09% | -10.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | -20.77% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -20.77% | -14.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.98% | -25.46% | -37.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -0.21% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -3.50% | -15.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 1.93% | +3.27% |
Volatility
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that S7XP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S7XP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 2.65% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 7.24% | +11.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 10.49% | +12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 14.23% | +11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 16.22% | +11.70% |
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S7XP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
S7XP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S7XP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S7XP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for S7XP.L.
S7XP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. S7XP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for S7XP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for S7XP.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer