S600.L vs. LEML.L
S600.L (Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF) and LEML.L (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD) are both exchange-traded funds - S600.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LEML.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S600.L returned 10.10%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for LEML.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. S600.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for LEML.L.
Performance
S600.L vs. LEML.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S600.L achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than LEML.L's 25.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with S600.L having a 10.10% annualized return and LEML.L not far ahead at 10.54%.
S600.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
LEML.L
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 25.85%
- 6M
- 26.59%
- 1Y
- 52.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
S600.L vs. LEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S600.L Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF | 6.62% | 26.17% | 3.70% | 13.14% | -4.95% | 16.44% | 3.69% | 20.15% | -9.75% | 15.24% |
LEML.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD | 25.85% | 24.60% | 8.72% | 2.68% | -10.69% | -1.92% | 13.57% | 13.03% | -9.98% | 24.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between S600.L and LEML.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.67 |
The correlation between S600.L and LEML.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
S600.L vs. LEML.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S600.L
LEML.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
S600.L
LEML.L
Industrials
S600.L
LEML.L
Healthcare
S600.L
LEML.L
Technology
S600.L
LEML.L
Consumer Defensive
S600.L
LEML.L
Consumer Cyclical
S600.L
LEML.L
Energy
S600.L
LEML.L
Basic Materials
S600.L
LEML.L
Utilities
S600.L
LEML.L
Communication Services
S600.L
LEML.L
Real Estate
S600.L
LEML.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S600.L vs. LEML.L — Risk / Return Rank
S600.L
LEML.L
S600.L vs. LEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (S600.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S600.L | LEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.58 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 4.87 | -3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | 16.96 | -10.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S600.L | LEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 3.14 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.50 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.59 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.42 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
S600.L vs. LEML.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S600.L drawdown since its inception was -30.21%, smaller than the maximum LEML.L drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S600.L and LEML.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S600.L | LEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.21% | -31.91% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -10.89% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.53% | -15.34% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -24.14% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.21% | -27.59% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -2.51% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -10.48% | +6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.13% | -0.23% |
Volatility
S600.L vs. LEML.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (S600.L) is 4.05%, while Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that S600.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S600.L | LEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 7.42% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 14.42% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 16.89% | -4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 16.15% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 17.94% | -3.08% |
S600.L vs. LEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S600.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LEML.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
S600.L vs. LEML.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S600.L nor LEML.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S600.L and LEML.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S600.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S600.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LEML.L.
S600.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while LEML.L is Emerging Markets Equities. S600.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LEML.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for S600.L and 0.55% for LEML.L.
Find the right allocation for S600.L and LEML.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer