S5SD.L vs. UC96.L
S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) and UC96.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - S5SD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while UC96.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, S5SD.L returned 30.12% vs 19.26% for UC96.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. S5SD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC96.L.
Performance
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S5SD.L achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than UC96.L's 6.54% return.
S5SD.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 30.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UC96.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 9.02% | 27.97% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.54% | 16.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between S5SD.L and UC96.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.65 |
The correlation between S5SD.L and UC96.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Communication Services
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Financial Services
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Healthcare
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Industrials
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Consumer Defensive
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Consumer Cyclical
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Energy
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Real Estate
S5SD.L
UC96.L
-
Basic Materials
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Utilities
S5SD.L
UC96.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L — Risk / Return Rank
S5SD.L
UC96.L
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S5SD.L | UC96.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.32 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 2.79 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 9.08 | +6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S5SD.L | UC96.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 1.80 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.09 | 0.73 | +2.36 |
Drawdowns
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S5SD.L drawdown since its inception was -7.32%, smaller than the maximum UC96.L drawdown of -27.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5SD.L and UC96.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S5SD.L | UC96.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -27.20% | +19.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -6.87% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -4.30% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.12% | -0.22% |
Volatility
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S5SD.L | UC96.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 2.93% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.10% | 7.52% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 10.64% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 14.04% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 15.94% | -4.47% |
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S5SD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UC96.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
S5SD.L vs. UC96.L - Dividend Comparison
S5SD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.78% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
S5SD.L and UC96.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC96.L.
S5SD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while UC96.L is Large Cap Value Equities. S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S5SD.L and 0.25% for UC96.L.
Find the right allocation for S5SD.L and UC96.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer