S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) and IUMS.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - S5SD.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while IUMS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, S5SD.L returned 30.12% vs 19.40% for IUMS.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. S5SD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUMS.L.

Performance

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

S5SD.L is traded in GBp, while IUMS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S5SD.L achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly lower than IUMS.L's 12.98% return.

S5SD.L

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 30.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IUMS.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 12.98%
• 6M: 15.93%
• 1Y: 19.40%
• 3Y*: 8.27%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis	9.02%	27.97%
IUMS.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	12.98%	11.82%

Correlation

The correlation between S5SD.L and IUMS.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.42

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	S5SD.L	IUMS.L
Technology	38.6%	-
Communication Services	14.5%	-
Financial Services	12.0%	-
Healthcare	9.3%	-
Industrials	6.8%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	8.5%
Energy	4.2%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	91.5%
Utilities	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S5SD.L

S5SD.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
S5SD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

IUMS.L

IUMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
IUMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IUMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
IUMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
IUMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
IUMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	S5SD.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	1.20	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	1.71	+2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.21	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	1.78	+2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.94	6.15	+9.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the IUMS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S5SD.L and IUMS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	S5SD.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	1.20	+1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.09	0.45	+2.64

Drawdowns

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S5SD.L drawdown since its inception was -7.32%, smaller than the maximum IUMS.L drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5SD.L and IUMS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	S5SD.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.32%	-28.94%	+21.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.32%	-10.82%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-2.96%	+2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-5.57%	+4.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	3.15%	-1.25%

Volatility

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) is 2.81%, while iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that S5SD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	S5SD.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	5.73%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.10%	13.27%	-6.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	16.08%	-5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.47%	17.42%	-5.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.47%	19.28%	-7.81%

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S5SD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IUMS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

S5SD.L vs. IUMS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither S5SD.L nor IUMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both S5SD.L and IUMS.L in my portfolio?

S5SD.L and IUMS.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, S5SD.L or IUMS.L?

On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, S5SD.L or IUMS.L?

S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUMS.L.

What is the main difference between S5SD.L and IUMS.L?

S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUMS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S5SD.L and 0.15% for IUMS.L.