S400.L vs. VJPB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

S400.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF) and VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Invesco and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, S400.L returned 9.97%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for VJPB.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. S400.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPB.L.

Performance

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

S400.L is traded in GBp, while VJPB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VJPB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S400.L achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly lower than VJPB.L's 16.20% return.

S400.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: 15.40%
• 6M: 14.83%
• 1Y: 31.77%
• 3Y*: 15.05%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

VJPB.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.30%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 15.61%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
S400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF	15.40%	17.62%	8.31%	13.66%	-5.83%	0.91%	12.00%	-2.11%
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	16.20%	17.98%	8.49%	13.45%	-6.28%	1.76%	12.11%	-2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between S400.L and VJPB.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.98

The correlation between S400.L and VJPB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	S400.L	VJPB.L
Industrials	27.6%	26.6%
Technology	19.6%	17.4%
Financial Services	13.9%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	12.8%
Communication Services	6.7%	7.1%
Healthcare	6.3%	5.9%
Basic Materials	5.3%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.2%
Real Estate	2.4%	3.4%
Utilities	1.5%	1.3%
Energy	1.2%	1.0%

Return for Risk

S400.L vs. VJPB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S400.L

S400.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
S400.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
S400.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
S400.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
S400.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
S400.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	S400.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.91	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.70	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.36	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	3.16	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.75	10.23	-0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S400.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S400.L and VJPB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	S400.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.91	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.65	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.53	+0.06

Drawdowns

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S400.L drawdown since its inception was -24.69%, roughly equal to the maximum VJPB.L drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S400.L and VJPB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	S400.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.69%	-24.65%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-10.67%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.83%	-13.60%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.34%	-18.32%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.19%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-5.34%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	3.31%	-0.06%

Volatility

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) have volatilities of 3.99% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	S400.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	3.88%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.23%	14.42%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.33%	17.70%	-0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.38%	15.47%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.80%	16.69%	-0.89%

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S400.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VJPB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

S400.L vs. VJPB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither S400.L nor VJPB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both S400.L and VJPB.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, S400.L and VJPB.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, S400.L or VJPB.L?

On fees, VJPB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, S400.L or VJPB.L?

VJPB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for S400.L.

What is the main difference between S400.L and VJPB.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for S400.L and 0.15% for VJPB.L.