PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
S400.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

S400.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - S400.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S400.L returned 9.95%/yr vs 22.47%/yr for EQQQ.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. S400.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.

Performance

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S400.L achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.86% return. Over the past 10 years, S400.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 9.95%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.47% annualized return.

S400.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.05%
YTD
15.40%
6M
14.83%
1Y
31.77%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
9.95%

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
9.63%
YTD
19.86%
6M
18.38%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
22.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S400.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF		15.40%17.62%8.31%13.66%-5.83%0.91%12.00%14.33%-9.33%13.69%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		19.86%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%20.12%

Correlation

The correlation between S400.L and EQQQ.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2014

0.58

The correlation between S400.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
S400.L
EQQQ.L

Industrials

27.6%
2.8%

Technology

19.6%
57.9%

Financial Services

13.9%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
11.6%

Communication Services

6.7%
14.5%

Healthcare

6.3%
3.7%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
6.6%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.0%

Utilities

1.5%
1.2%

Energy

1.2%
0.5%

Industrials

S400.L
27.6%
EQQQ.L
2.8%

Technology

S400.L
19.6%
EQQQ.L
57.9%

Financial Services

S400.L
13.9%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

S400.L
10.9%
EQQQ.L
11.6%

Communication Services

S400.L
6.7%
EQQQ.L
14.5%

Healthcare

S400.L
6.3%
EQQQ.L
3.7%

Basic Materials

S400.L
5.3%
EQQQ.L
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

S400.L
4.6%
EQQQ.L
6.6%

Real Estate

S400.L
2.4%
EQQQ.L
0.0%

Utilities

S400.L
1.5%
EQQQ.L
1.2%

Energy

S400.L
1.2%
EQQQ.L
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with S400.L:
S400.L vs. ^N225S400.L vs. CNKY.LS400.L vs. EXX7.DES400.L vs. JPXNS400.L vs. DXJG.LS400.L vs. SPYS400.L vs. HMJP.L
Often compared with EQQQ.L:
EQQQ.L vs. QQQEQQQ.L vs. QQQMEQQQ.L vs. EQGB.LEQQQ.L vs. CNX1.LEQQQ.L vs. EQQU.LEQQQ.L vs. CSPX.LEQQQ.L vs. XNAQ.L

Return for Risk

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
S400.L
S400.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
S400.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S400.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
S400.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
S400.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
S400.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

S400.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.83
2.82

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.60
3.71

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.50

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.78

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

11.13

-1.38

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S400.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S400.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

S400.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.82

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.99

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

1.16

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.92

-0.32

Drawdowns

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S400.L drawdown since its inception was -24.69%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S400.L and EQQQ.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

S400.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.69%

-33.75%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-10.97%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.83%

-24.09%

+11.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.34%

-27.76%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.69%

-27.76%

+3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.63%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-5.61%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.73%

-0.48%

Volatility

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) have volatilities of 3.99% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

S400.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.15%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

10.33%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

14.70%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

19.14%

-3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

19.35%

-3.55%

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S400.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

S400.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

S400.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
S400.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

S400.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S400.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S400.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

S400.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. S400.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for S400.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S400.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer