PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S250.L vs. EUHD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S250.L achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than EUHD.L's 9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, S250.L has underperformed EUHD.L with an annualized return of 5.79%, while EUHD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.


S250.L

1D
0.50%
1M
4.20%
YTD
5.31%
6M
7.34%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
5.79%

EUHD.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.24%
YTD
9.29%
6M
11.09%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S250.L
Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF
5.31%12.81%7.93%7.60%-17.52%16.69%-4.90%28.57%-13.48%17.36%
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
9.29%42.88%5.23%11.37%-3.26%13.30%-13.39%11.53%-7.27%13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between S250.L and EUHD.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2016

0.61

The correlation between S250.L and EUHD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
S250.L
EUHD.L

Industrials

19.9%
3.8%

Financial Services

19.5%
35.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
10.4%

Real Estate

9.4%
11.6%

Technology

9.3%

-

Basic Materials

6.6%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
3.7%

Communication Services

5.9%
6.3%

Healthcare

4.4%
0.0%

Utilities

3.0%
12.1%

Energy

2.5%
6.8%

Industrials

S250.L
19.9%
EUHD.L
3.8%

Financial Services

S250.L
19.5%
EUHD.L
35.2%

Consumer Cyclical

S250.L
13.3%
EUHD.L
10.4%

Real Estate

S250.L
9.4%
EUHD.L
11.6%

Technology

S250.L
9.3%
EUHD.L

-

Basic Materials

S250.L
6.6%
EUHD.L
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

S250.L
6.1%
EUHD.L
3.7%

Communication Services

S250.L
5.9%
EUHD.L
6.3%

Healthcare

S250.L
4.4%
EUHD.L
0.0%

Utilities

S250.L
3.0%
EUHD.L
12.1%

Energy

S250.L
2.5%
EUHD.L
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S250.L vs. EUHD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S250.L
S250.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
S250.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S250.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
S250.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
S250.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
S250.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

EUHD.L
EUHD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S250.LEUHD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

3.39

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

11.84

-7.35

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S250.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S250.L and EUHD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S250.LEUHD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.18

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.94

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.61

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.62

-0.07

Drawdowns

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S250.L drawdown since its inception was -40.91%, which is greater than EUHD.L's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S250.L and EUHD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S250.LEUHD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.91%

-35.97%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-7.17%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.16%

-10.52%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.69%

-19.82%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.91%

-35.97%

-4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-2.09%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-5.30%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.06%

+1.13%

Volatility

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (S250.L) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L) at 3.72%. This indicates that S250.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUHD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S250.LEUHD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

3.72%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

8.70%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

11.18%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

13.74%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

15.55%

+0.88%

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S250.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EUHD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

S250.L vs. EUHD.L - Dividend Comparison

S250.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUHD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
3.95%4.61%5.86%5.50%5.44%4.28%3.06%4.66%4.34%3.41%3.51%
S250.L
Invesco FTSE 250 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


S250.L and EUHD.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S250.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S250.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EUHD.L.

S250.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while EUHD.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S250.L and 0.30% for EUHD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S250.L and EUHD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer