RZG vs. FSGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS).
RZG and FSGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RZG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. FSGS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the SMID Growth Strength Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2017. Both RZG and FSGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RZG vs. FSGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RZG vs. FSGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 4.96% | 10.22% | 9.84% | 19.15% | -29.00% | 21.01% | 17.76% | 14.25% | -8.70% | 12.05% |
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | -4.02% | 2.41% | 6.38% | 15.98% | -13.17% | 25.56% | 10.26% | 21.31% | -11.92% | 10.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RZG achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than FSGS's -4.02% return.
RZG
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
FSGS
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -6.45%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.15%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RZG vs. FSGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RZG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSGS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RZG vs. FSGS — Risk / Return Rank
RZG
FSGS
RZG vs. FSGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RZG | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.34 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 0.66 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.08 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 0.57 | +1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.39 | 1.72 | +5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RZG | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.34 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.11 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.28 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between RZG and FSGS is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RZG vs. FSGS - Dividend Comparison
RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while FSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.37% | 0.95% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.70% |
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.71% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 1.35% | 1.32% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RZG vs. FSGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZG drawdown since its inception was -58.52%, which is greater than FSGS's maximum drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZG and FSGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RZG | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.52% | -43.26% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -11.84% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.33% | -24.08% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -9.71% | +5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.22% | -8.08% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.89% | -0.68% |
Volatility
RZG vs. FSGS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) at 5.40%. This indicates that RZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RZG | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 5.40% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 11.33% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.70% | 19.90% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.09% | 20.16% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 22.95% | +1.67% |